TOE page 2 – Theory of Gravity

to page 1

Theory of gravity

The hiding graviton does it exist? The search is in progress now in year 2003. And have been so for several years. Personally, I have little hope for finding it. They should have been so, if existing…

Another approach is current. Hmm… You have to work on several threads for finding a comprehensive way to a stable theory. And I have to admit; yes, I’m an Aether fan. The concept of an Aether solves many of the unanswered questions raised in recent years. The big question is also why it’s so impossible for a lot of scientists with an Aether?

First, an Aether theory would explain why not finding the graviton in spite of billions of dollars invested in searching projects. You can almost say the investments here indicate an Aether. Aha… I see… The scientists are also making the same evaluation, but the indication is based on a negative result. A so-called exclude or discard result. But as I see it the enormous amount of dollars is a rather good indication of this state in this matter an Aether is, or once was, present.

Artistic view of the graviton

Yes, I see more… If an Aether once was present you can spend billions and billions of dollars on finding the discard result, and this is the situation. You can invest the global total amount fund of the total scientific research year after year and yet only get this discard result. An elusive situation is at the agenda of quantum mechanics research.

In the following theorizing I’m going to try to show why the graviton hides and why it’s impossible to measure it with time and position. And how the Theory of Gravity, TOG, is linked with the Aether in a more theoretical and comprehensive modeling. The graviton does in spite of these models still tease the mind, maybe because of its non-existing nature and therefore not measurable quality.


Subsection 1
Theory of time

Recent reasoning in a newsgroup gave two objectives for time:
Cause and effect.

What causes time? And. The effect of time? Or effect on what?

Time postulate 1. The cause of time is created by all forms of energy.
Time postulate 2. The effect of time is only applied on matter.

These 2 postulates give some interesting scenarios:
When a photon is emitting quanta the photon is no longer in “space-time” (*1). And when a photon is collecting quanta it appears in the “space-time”. This cycle of the photon is fundamental.

But this scenario is not new – we all know it. Why mention it? It’s mentioned to show, if we are using Time postulate 2, that the photon has matter. And this some will disagree. But time can only have an effect on matter, according to this postulate. The problem of the photon, the question of being of energy/wave/mass is also solved here. With some further explanations for the photon not in “space-time” or on its border.


Subsection 2
Theory of space

Space, yes how to count it?

We give time 1 second as a dimension. (Duration changes in matter.)
We give length 1 meter as a dimension. (Distance.)
We give space 3 axis x, y, z as dimensions. (Directions.)

See, space doesn’t have any specific numbers of dimensions (x, y, z = 3 dimensions). We give space three legs x, y, z because it’s simplest and most logical in a mathematical sense to give space three dimensions! In a pure physical sense the number of dimensions space has is irrelevant. It’s just most easy to calculate and visualize with 3 space directions for intellects.

So string theorists, for example, just give space the amount of dimensions that is good for their exclusive theory in mind. One theory is good with 10 space dimensions. And the other theory is best with 5 space dimensions.

Space doesn’t have a specific three dimensional structure, it’s just a scaffold construction of the human mind. Space is physically all between non-dimensional and infinite-dimensional.

Space does not have any specific amount of dimensions or directions.


Subsection 3
Special theory of gravity

To be more precise, in this part of TOE I am going to define my Theory of Gravity, TOG, in a more comprehensive and described theory, the Special Theory of Gravity – STOG.

The Aether is the explanation. The first Aether is partly gravity. This is the basic view of TOG. Further, the Aether has gathered for eons of time in Universe. The age of the oldest known universal object is a fraction of a nanosecond in comparison with the time for the Aether to gather in Universe. Time does not exist in the Aether itself and time does absolutely not exist in the gathering of the Aether in a so-called phase 1 Aether, A1. The A1 has no phase before it, a phase 0 Aether does not exist in a theoretical sense. -At least it’s empty of any “matter”.

A1 [pronounced Aether 1] is the stage where no kind of matter is present in the Aether. And A1 is having a size greater than the size of the known borders of our Universe. A1 is as mentioned gravity, partly gravity, in the meaning of absolutely no existing matter in the Aether.

When the Aether is gathering more and more it reaches to the size of the known Universe and now something happens. The first “matter” is created. Do you understand which “matter” I’m hinting at? We have a rather good indication of this in our knowledge of our elementary particles.

There is something in the elementary particle chart or categorizing method indicating a specific particle in mind? Which particle is a contradiction in the total family of elementary particles?

Which particle does not have any given antiparticle?
Only one. -The photon. Why so one can ask? The STOG gives the answer:

The first photon, γ, is created when the Aether shrinks and gathers the size of our known Universe. The phase 1 Aether is going into phase 2 Aether. One can schematically give this point or phase a formula:

γ = ª qG´t [A1 D A2]

This indicates that in the shift from A1 to A2 we suddenly have matter in this changing Aether. Small q stands for the known quanta and its effect on the photon and other elementary particles. G´ stands for the total gravity effect of the Aether at the specific moment, t, when we shift from phase 1 Aether to phase 2 Aether. This is STOG. And more, we are having a point of self regulation or a point of stability in this phase 2 Aether, A2, because of quanta regulation. Known as the quanta collect to and quanta emit from the photon.

A Universe is born.


Subsection 4
The creation of matter

According to the Aether theory no matter is present in phase A1, but there exists gravity, which is gathering or is rising in amount. At a certain point, A2, the total gravity effect is creating the first photon. This is the basis of the creation of matter.

The concept of matter, according to Einstein, is that matter equals energy, not gravity, which STOG is predicting. But if assuming that gravity is or behaves like energy.

The innovation here is that we may have an acceptable link between energy and gravity. Mainly these formulas:

E=mc^2
And if we also simplifies the formula for the photon, γ:
γ = ª qG´t [A1 D A2]
to
γ = QG´ [A2]
Meaning the photon, γ, is the sum of quanta, Q, of the gravity effect, G´, in phase A2.

We are also having the known energy in a single photon known as Planck’s constant h. Also the speed of light known as c, gives a mathematical ability to calculate the mass, the gravity, of the photon if wished.

The point here to mention is that the photon according to STOG is created and manifested as a photon without any reference to its energy or mass. But existing by the effect of the gravity phase, at the changing Aether, called A2. STOG is only a reference for the photon as being created by gravity. But we are having some help here to come further. The breaking point or question is:

What creates matter? What creates for example a photon? And the answer is STOG. Gravity and the Aether shifting from A1 to A2 creates the photon. This indicates that – when – the energy of the photon equals Plank’s constant, h, that the first phases of the Aether, A1 and A2, hold both energy and gravity.

And if you ask, for example, what matter this coin in my hand is created of? The answer will be: The photon is a – link – to the matter in your coin in your hand.

Meaning gravity does not only make your coin have a mass and a weight but also is the basis of the matter itself in the coin as a creator of the mass and the weight of the coin.

To give the link between energy and gravity we take the particle of the photon. We know before that h, Planck’s constant, is the energy given in the photon. Also, the reference model of the creation of it, the formula; γ = QG´ [A2].

Gives ; E – h – G´ ; Planck’s constant, h, is the link between energy, E, and gravity, G´, as being the energy bound in the photon which is created of the gravity in Aether phase A2.

One can finally in this subsection mention that Planck’s constant, h, probably is a basis for the quanta regulation of the photon in the Aether phase A2. Planck’s constant, h, should also be a basis for the Aether versus c balance, the speed of light. Giving references for the stability of the photon in motion.


Subsection 5
Black holes

Black holes are still a mystery in physics, but not a mystery in the Aether theory thus being rather easily explained. In Aether phase A2 we have the first photon created in the Universe. Phase A2 is explained as a stable phase with the quanta- photon regulation as a basic regulator for the gravity effect G´ in the simplified formula; γ = QG´ [A2].

“Shortly” after the first photon created in a Universe about the size of our present Universe the whole phase A2 Universe is filled with “newborn” photons. One can schematically say that 100% of the matter in this new Universe is of photons and only of photons. -This “development” of the “newborn” Universe and Aether being in a new “photon“- A2 phase, shifting from A1, is a very good explanation of the photon not having any specific antiparticle.

These photons are not having any velocity compared to the Aether but are in a lower energy stage than photons with velocity. These low energy low speed photons are probably a link to the question of dark matter and dark energy in our present Universe.

Of course these low energy photons with no or low velocity are also gathering together because of their bond of gravity and energy. When the whole Universe is filled up with new photons the total gravity effect in the Aether no longer is in Aether phase A2. -Locally the total gravity effect in the Aether arises from phase A2 to phase A3. We are having an Aether with both phases A2 and A3 and also volumes with the shifts between A2 and A3. Photons gathered together represent Aether phase A3 and a A3 is a Black hole.

Cyg X-1 Black hole dragging matter from a supergiant according to NASA

The number of A3: s or Black holes is rising to the amount of more than all galaxies in our Universe up to present time. The number of A3: s is based on the size of our Universe and the total amount of gravity and energy in the Universe. With this model you probably notice and hint my conviction about a Black hole in the center of every galaxy in the Universe.

To give the premises between the Aether phases A1, A2 and A3 we must understand that photons do not exist in phase A1. If phase A1 occurs the photon is disintegrated to quanta. But the gravity itself is rebuilding the phase of A2 and therefore the photons are recreated. The photons do also gather together and give A3: s locally in the Aether. These A3: s do consume much energy locally and therefore the surrounding phase A2 is having very strong tendencies to shift back to phase A1 and is also doing so locally.

These three phases, A1, A2 and A3, are now when A3: s exists as self-sustaining local gravity-energy deposits interacting in a highly complex manner. This is also hinting why Black holes are so hard to detect by modern techniques. A3: s are locally surrounded by photon disintegrating phase A1 volumes. And this makes it so hard to “see” any A3: s – Black holes. -Observe that this form of Aether is very drained from both gravity and energy and becomes a very thorough reason for nowadays physics non-detection of any Aether at all. This stage of the Universe also lacks most elementary particles known today. -Probably the Universe at this stage only holds photons and also some variants of photons, such as X-ray and gamma-ray photons, inclusive WIMPs, weakly interacting massive particles.

When proposing the A3: s responsible for the disintegration of the photons, their variants and the WIMPs near the locality of any major Black hole. -One must suggest that this physical disintegration is a fair reason for the gravitational constant, G, also known as “big G“, to be established as a constant. -Maybe this being the only primary reason. This is explained with the present cosmic situation of about two trillion major Black holes each placed in each center of every galaxy in the known Universe; acts in an – universal regulating manner – for the photon cycle described in the formula of γ = ª qG´t [A1 D A2]. Maybe the G´ in the formula can be disclosed for “big G“, the gravitational constant, used in Newton’s classical physics and in the GR equations, for instance. Further reviewing in this page can better indicate why and in what manner the once existing Aether has been established in this proposed function. Observe that the A2 is the photon existing phase where the A1 phase represents the photon disintegrated condition. And the A3: s are the theorized regulators which in novel Universe have all photons being produced in all existing stars as a “medium” for the regulating mechanism establishing the universal gravitational constant, G. Even if the Black holes are the primary reson for this regulation there obviously are other universal activities that probably contribute, such as the build of vast amounts of hydrogen being the most common visible matter in Universe. Exactly how hydrogen is established and exactly how the photon’s dissolved energy parts incorporate at the hydrogen build is more a matter for the chemists. So, generally at this site we focus on the Black holes responsible for this universal basic regulation.


Subsection 6
Special theory of quantum mechanics

We have earlier in Subsection 4 mentioned that with the formula of E=mc^2, knowing the speed of light c and Planck’s constant h, being able to calculate the mass of the photon. With further analysis we find some problem here because the mass is at quantum level for the photon. It’s hard to think Einstein meant the formula E=mc^2 applied to quantum objects. But more to Newton objects. -Though this famous formula is related to Einstein’s SR equations which examines light in general, its energy, propagation, and time dilation, for example. How this formula can both be used in the Newton and the QM scales is really astonishing.

And the photon is not in the Newton scale. We really are having a problem here fitting the E=mc^2 to the photon scale. This problem is perhaps solved with some further formulas dividing the photon in a mass aspect, m. -And an energy aspect of eV, electron-volt, sign of latency at the photon. With these divergences we can postulate the mass aspect of the photon, the qraviton:

q = u/g < 1

Meaning the tension, u, of the qraviton, q, divided with the gravity, g, of the qraviton is smaller than 1. This is the Special theory of Quantum Mechanics – SQM.

Planck’s constant, h, shows the visibility, the latency-sign or energy, x eV, of the photon. Not showing the weight or mass, m, of the photon. This is the problem of the m in the formula E=mc^2 applied to such quanta particles.

When we are splitting the photon it manifests as tension, u, not as gravity, g, or mass, m, because of the function of tension versus gravity. The tension decreases less than the gravity from a point of equilibrium (the intact photon), when the distance is increasing. And vice versa occurs when the distance is decreasing. We also have to understand that the equilibrium function of the photon always adjusts till its surrounding, and therefore always is hiding its mass. Effectively the mass of the photon obviously always is zero, 0.

But the question of the mass, m, of the photon still has to be derived from the formula or postulate q = u/g < 1. Which are the nearest we come to the question of the existing or not existing graviton asked at the beginning of this page.


Subsection 7
Special electromagnetic field

With the formula of SQM, the Special theory of Quantum Mechanics, there naturally forms a concept of the Special Electromagnetic Field – semf:

semf = u/g > 1

Meaning the tension, u, of the special electromagnetic field, semf, divided with the gravity, g, of the special electromagnetic field is greater than 1. This is the special theory of the electromagnetic field – semf.

This formula rules the basics of the electromagnetic field – EMF. Forming all other functions concerning the electromagnetic environments of the Universe.


Subsection 8
The quantum energy balance

With the formulas of the qraviton and the semf ruling our Universe we naturally can postulate the balance of energies:

ª u/g < 1 = ª u/g > 1 = ª E = 0

Meaning the sum of gravity equals the sum of tension equals the total sum of energy equals zero. This is the Quantum Energy Balance, the – QEB formula. -Expressed in a philosophical manner.

The same formula written in a more physically complying way:

ª [ ª u/g < 1 <ª u/g > 1 ] = ª E = ƒ {T}

These two balance formulas hint at the correlation of symmetrical energies and the probable existence of energy both in an acceptable philosophical and physical form.


Subsection 9
Attempt of unifying GR and QM

So, Albert Einstein was right, again. And Stephen Hawking with his GUT, Grand Unification Theory, was wrong. At least if one considers the formulas here recently given. Especially if the qraviton formula or postulate is right indicates that our Universe is governed from a non-vector form of gravity which Hawking disbelieved in. -And Einstein who postulated that gravity not was a force, F, and not being induced or carried by a boson. -However did come from the bent space curvature in the vast Universe holding massive objects that formed the bent space representing gravity.

The qraviton postulate, q = u/g < 1, here presented indicates that in A1, Aether 1, where no matter exists, yet. -There exists some type of a huge “fat” “soup” of both qravitons and special electromagnetic field, semf. -This manifests that gravity not being a force and no vector thus being a pre- “matter” “condition”, that eventually will take part in all later upcoming massive, and non-massive, objects in the developing space. -How all other massive and non-massive objects and particles in space finally occur is presented later in this page.

If trying to unify General Relativity, GR, and Quantum Mechanics, QM, we first have to refresh our GR…

“By the large GR tries to unify Newton physics with Einstein’s own Special Relativity. Einstein contributes by adding time to the three dimensional space into the commonly called spacetime unit, holding four dimensions. Also, the idea of gravity not being a natural force but an effect of how energy and matter are distributed in space. The Newton form of gravity has an outcome only locally. But as you incorporate more space General Relativity determines gravity as – behavior – of energy, matter – and space.

Einstein’s view of gravity is similar to Newton’s, if you only focus on matter or energy that determines gravity. Einstein obviously wanted, very much, to add time into the three standard space dimensions. For a layman this resembles any engineer working with polar or rectangular elements. It’s the same, only different ways of expressing vectors. But Einstein would surely oppose this last conclusion mainly since he did not want to see gravitation itself from a vector point. – More a product, effect or result of matter moving in space – through different zones with different spacetime curvatures. Space is only straight locally. Extend space and it curves, due to casually deposited matter and energy, interacting, relatively moving or not, up till the borders of Universe.”

“Einstein finally in his GR concluded that gravitation does not exist as a force in itself but is an effect of the curved spacetime. This is a rather strange conclusion – but his idea came from his own equations – and is proved experimentally and also is confirmed in every observation.”

(See Quotes page 4 – General Relativity) to page 4

The Quantum Mechanics, QM, presented here in this TOE site depends on ideas of the origin of QM presented in the Quantum Energy Balance, QEB, formula. Determining the basic forms of gravity/ qraviton and its balanced form of energy, the special electromagnetic field, semf; and how the gravity/ qraviton (and the semf) “will take part in all later upcoming massive, and non-massive, objects in the developing space.” In this manner we can indicate and determine how GR and QM are unified.

If one analyzes the QEB formula a bit closer one can presume that it follows the statistical normal distribution frequency or curve:

Normal distribution – Probability density function

ª [ ª u/g < 1 <ª u/g > 1 ] = ª E = ƒ {T}

Where the amount of the energies, the gravity, qravitons, and the tension, semf, both peak at the value of 1.

This indicates that the weakest forms of both energies are the most frequent occurring. -Here one can note that these both energies that peaks extremely near the value of 1: A, are involved into the “top” of the normal distribution. I.e. are the most frequent “entities”. B, loses their “physical abilities” to take part in further universal development and remains as “left over energies“. These “left over energies” are both very strong candidates for the novel universal detection of vast amounts of “dark matter” and “dark energy“. Also the findings of in Universe free floating “clouds” of WIMPs, weakly interacting massive particles, can probably be found somewhere from the “sides” of the normal distribution curve. I.e. these massive particles have “some problems” “taking part” in further universal physics and interaction.

To “sketch” how the Quantum Energy Balance formula takes part in general relativity, GR, we have in previous paragraph indicated the predominant amount of the low potent energies, quasi- qravitons and quasi- SEMF (*2), don’t take part in universal “visible” physics. -Thus remains in Universe as, more or less, “inactive” “dark matter” and “dark energy“. When the more physically “active” and potent gravity and the electromagnetic field (on the sides of the normal distribution curve) are taking part in the physical interaction and development of Universe. -The “active” qraviton, q = u/g < 1, gravity-energy, which not is trapped in the inactive “left over energies“, will later in the developing Universe contribute to mass and take part in wide range gravity (aka GR). -And the “active” special electromagnetic field, semf = u/g > 1, will establish EMF environments of the developing space.

The entity of the qraviton, q = u/g < 1, obviously enables QM premises for a non- force and a non-vector induced gravity in space and Universe, transferring gravitational ability. -This is in line with the Theory of Everything, TOE‘s, most searched unification of GR, General Relativity, and QM, Quantum Mechanics. -I will later in this page more thoroughly present or indicate how this most wanted bond can be achieved. Also glimpse how SR, Special Relativity, touches unification with quantum mechanics with the correlation of light and the photon, and “familiar” particles to the photon.


Subsection 10
The transformation of the universe

With the formula of QEB, Quantum Energy Balance, we are going into a stage of the Universe, which by all means needs a supercomputer to set straight all physical constants that are forming. What I for the moment can see is that the Aether 1, A1, is no longer present as in the beginning of the forming the Universe. Aether 2, A2, is modified, till an almost vacuum state, but existing. And, Black holes, Aether 3, or A3:s, are created in vast amounts draining the young Universe from its initial gravity and energy.

What has happened in the transformation? Or what has caused the transformation?

The theory says that the Black holes which are swamping and rising in amount, in the new Universe, the phase after the modified Aether 2, are the function or objects that have the most impact on the first upcoming massive particles. –Electrons and protons are created inside and emitting from the Black holes and merging into enormous amounts of hydrogen gas (*3). -Which then starts the creation of stars and all its different products related to this process. And when the stars are established more new particles are being produced.

However there is a peculiar situation concerning the Black holes, which modern astrophysics have indicated. First, all galaxies in the Universe are obviously aligned into a flat disk. The Universe therefore is flat. Secondly, there seems to be a Black hole in the center of each galaxy. So, the accumulated rising amount of the Black holes in Universe obviously becomes aligned into a x, y plane.

And there is at least one explanation for this: The rise of the first Black holes must have been located into a special area or volume in the Universe at the beginning. This is rather probable since this form of “birth” of Black holes needs very much gravitational energy that probably is achieved in one special spot depending on the Universe’s time- frame development. -Observe that a slightly different time frame development could have created another shape in our Universe. And when the first Black hole begins to produce vast amounts of hydrogen this hydrogen “field” “amplifies” the upcoming of the second Black hole via the gravitation that this hydrogen “field” establishes.

With the “nearby” third Black hole rising in Universe there is a x, y plane created that, with help of the now added vast hydrogen gravitational “field”, is continuing the creation of a flat Universe. -With its Black holes at the center of each later upcoming galaxy. -Also probably the special physical behavior with the production of vast amounts of stars in conjunction with huge hydrogen “fields” that surrounds the earliest Black holes is furthermore helping the universal Black holes’ x, y – plane to form. We also have to keep in mind that a Black hole has an enormous gravitational impact on its surroundings. Which can be helpful in the summoning of more gravitational energy till the total Black holes’ aligning process. Maybe also “cannibalism” occurs, that creates even more forceful Black holes. -Nevertheless we live in a flat Universe with the Black holes aligned in a thin plane with all the galaxies in Universe each circling around one of them.

To continue, and taking deal of physics of today, about the common description of the material assembled in the Universe, is that 5 percent is visible matter such as atoms, molecules, dust, stars and planets.

25 percent is dark matter, which behaves as visible matter, and the rest of 70 percent is dark energy, which is distributed throughout space and slowly varies in time. Scientists of today tend to describe this energy as being the cosmological constant or “Vacuum energy”. This proportion, of about 25/70 percent dark matter/energy, remaining in novel space is fully in line with the Black holes in entire Universe preferably, during the developing space, are collecting and draining the gravitational aspect of the dark entities. -Still. when obviously not fully draining Universe from gravity- energy one can presume that the weakest forms of this type of energy are eluding the impact of the Black holes by some physical function or reasons. We also have to be aware that Universe of today only is a time stamp. -Universe of yesterday is not the same as Universe of tomorrow.


Subsection 11
The young universe

With the formula of QEB, Quantum Energy Balance, our Universe is in the beginning of its cycle. What we can see that happens related to QEB is that the qravitons, gravity, are forming A3:s, Black holes. The special electromagnetic field, semf, energy, are forming the electromagnetic environments of our Universe. -Such quanta objects as photons, X-ray and gamma particles. Also WIMPs are gathered. This state of the Universe is present before the first star being established.

Still, when the rising amount of Black holes is escalating and they finally begin to emit electrons and protons, and the merging to hydrogen atoms and gas is everywhere; the Aether forms till an almost vacuum status. -This also answers the problem of the scientific community not detecting the Aether in our Universe. -Because it has been transformed from once holding the Aether.

Then the first stars are created, by the gathering of hydrogen gas, in such amounts that this manifests the first galaxy. -Since the Black holes, that are placed in the center of all upcoming galaxies, are formerly created with appropriate distances between them. -Because of the general local drain of gravitational energy at the establishment of the specific Black hole. -And, as reasoned in Subsection 10 all upcoming Black holes in Universe are aligned into a thin disk plane.

This is the fundamental answer why all galaxies in our Universe, also, are aligned into a thin disk. -Since all galaxies in Universe are originating from a Black hole, which each are swirling and surrounding the major Black hole. –NASA estimates the number of galaxies, in present time, to be 2 million millions in the observable Universe. Hence the number of Black holes should be about the same. -Though there are smaller Black holes created in Universe from stars that have reached their final stage and are collapsing into dense material. These “smaller” Black holes can probably not establish anything majestic that a galaxy, with several hundred thousand millions – 100 million stars, represents. -The creation of a single vast galaxy from a single major Black hole is hinting at the major Black hole’s enormous amount of assembled gravitation. And the number of observable galaxies in Universe, with at least one Black hole in each center, shows the gigantic amount of originating gravitational and electromagnetic energy assembled in our Universe.

If here trying to sketch out something about the WIMPs since they are mentioned in this Subsection. I have lately tried to place them either, near the gamma-ray photon side. Since the WIMPs have a faint mass and the gamma-ray photons are the particles from the photon family which are having the highest energies, aka the highest mass equivalence, in this family of “massless” particles. -Or, when some part of the scientific community defines the WIMPs belonging to dark matter; which makes them more adequately to be placed on the other, plain photon side (when photons having the least possible amount of energy). -Related to the earlier presented QEB statistical normal distribution curve.

If the WIMPs have a place, concerning their origin, somewhere inside and among the whole group of photons, X-ray photons and gamma-ray photons; and since the WIMPs are suspected to have a very small but physically visible mass; this, possible, “fox among the speckled chickens” may be some indication of that also the photon family, when regarded for being massless. -Can although be constructed with a concealed mass, as discussed in a later Subsection 13.


Subsection 12
A graviton alternative

Weight
If we begin with weight and mass, and uses Newtonian math we get that: 1 kg (mass) produces the force of about 9.81 Newton (weight) on earth’s surface and on the moon 1 kg creates a force of about 1/6 * 9.81 N. These figures and conversions are well known and points on the achieved acceleration which mass evokes on each other. Galileo and some other physicists showed and proved some 500 years ago that this type of acceleration is the same for any mass. Referring from earlier statements revealed that Aristotle was wrong when he claimed that different masses fall at different speeds. The equivalence for masses and such acceleration behavior was something which Einstein probably did use in some manner in his development of his gravity theory. And here we stand today with Einstein’s GR expressing the enigmatic physical behavior of gravity.

Mass
If continuing with how mass is manifested with standard physics of today the recent discovery of the Higgs boson and the everywhere in Universe existing Higgs field explains this, with the Higgs mechanism. -A theoretical physical and mathematical framework for explaining mass. Where virtual Higgs bosons are intermediating energy and mass to any elementary particles which in an intrinsic manner are massive. The photon, for example, which does not hold an intrinsic mass doesn’t acquire any mass from the Higgs field. The discovery of the Higgs boson in 2012 was a considerable achievement for the standard physics showing on the function of mass. When the exact mathematical framework for Higgs mechanics is rather complex it was a significant success of the standard model’s warrant to our elementary particles.

My own hesitation of this manner of explaining mass is built on the a bit non intuitive and the strong mathematical need for proving existence of mass. Mass to me naturally follows the famous energy-mass equivalence in E=mc^2. -Though, the mathematical framework of the Higgs field and Higgs boson does incorporate the principles of relativity, including Einstein’s famous equation to explain the origin of mass in Universe. And the accuracy of the standard model was even more proven in 2012 with the implementation of the prediction of the Higgs boson already from the mid 1960’s.

Gravity
Besides the geometric type of gravity which GR represents there are other gravity ideas based on the presence of gravitational fields with the bosonic graviton being the quantum excitation of this field. Though the GR formulas, the leading geometric gravity idea, have been validated by the LIGO detection of gravitational ripples and extreme small gravitational waves by amplitudes by a few thousand parts of the proton diameter. -Which therefore provides strong empirical evidence supporting Einstein’s theory of general relativity, where gravity is described as the curvature of spacetime caused by mass and energy. This detection does not definitively prove or disprove whether gravity is vector-based, such as the graviton idea, or not. -But it does confirm certain aspects of the geometric GR theory rather than a vector-based theory like Newtonian gravity or modern graviton related ideas.

The graviton
When the graviton idea is typically associated with the concept of a quantum particle mediating the gravitational force, similar to how photons mediate the electromagnetic force in quantum electrodynamics. In this context, the graviton is often envisioned as a vector particle. In quantum field theory approaches to gravity, such as quantum gravity or attempts to quantize General Relativity, the graviton is hypothesized as the quantum excitation of the gravitational field. As such, it is considered to be a force carrier particle that would transmit the gravitational interaction between massive objects. -Though still not found.

The alternative
Therefore, the most possible candidate in my view, for a graviton alternative, is a double entity function creating gravity, weight and mass in physics, which is indicated from the total description and “story” told in this page here so far. And the double entity function in mind is not a particle, it’s energy. -Gravitational energy described with the qraviton formula, q = u/g < 1. Gravitation does not have a boson, which carries this entity. Gravitation is not a force, F, which Albert Einstein, also, predicted in his general relativity theories. -Gravitation is energy not having a particle. This explanation can be likely, especially when the scientific community has problems finding the searched graviton.


Subsection 13
The misconception of zero light mass

Here are some intuitive examples indicating non-zero light mass.

Any given ray of light passing any massive object does not split in Chromatic aberration but does curve in a sharp ray. (E.g. starlight passing planets.)

This gives an opportunity to two light ray observations:

1. The AE (Albert Einstein) light deflection concerning light passing any massive object indicates nonzero light mass.
   
   
2. The Chromatic aberration that is missing does not indicate zero light mass because the Chromatic aberration affect(s) the wavelength(s) of any given ray of light. The condition here isn’t Chromatic aberration but gravitational “aberration” causing the deflection.

Further two examples indicating nonzero photon mass:

3. The “momentum” that the light (photon) possesses indicates nonzero mass because of that the classic laws of momentum are in a need of a mass, m, – if no mass no momentum.
   
   
4. The light possesses energy – the photon is since decades known to possess the energy of “h”, Planck’s constant, as the smallest amount of energy known to exist that is quantified. This quantified energy we know is traveling in space and we now know, and even have measured, the Vacuum energy that surrounds the “h” (photon) in space. This indicates any form of “package” or mass that keeps the “h” from merging with the Vacuum energy that surrounds the photon.

This is now four classical occurrences that indicate nonzero light mass. And one has to compare these four occurrences with the classical strength with any zero light mass theory or mathematics. And all of these zero mass theories lack significance in a non-intuitive manner. We now have four intuitive occurrences for light nonzero mass.

Shall we perhaps also make a parallel screening of the light, or of the photon, to get a broader sight? Let’s make a momentum and a velocity feature of the photon.

Momentum, p, in a classical view is:
p=mv;
mass multiplied with the velocity.

The QM momentum, p, for the photon has its own formula:
p=E/c;
the Energy, E, divided with the velocity, the speed of light, c.

For a single photon the energy is h, Planck’s constant. Observe that recent measures have shown h, Planck’s constant, to vary slight. The photon has momentum – but no mass – as defined for the photon momentum formula, here above.

So, photons do have momentum – with the velocity of c – and carrying the energy of h, Planck’s constant – but thus are defined with holding zero mass.

But the definition of photon momentum lacks something that has been discovered lately – the presence of the Vacuum energy – that surrounds the photon.

The Vacuum energy surrounding the photon gives a new aspect of the momentum formula of the photon:

p=E/c;
or for a single photon;
p=h/c.

Why doesn’t the h (the single photon) merge with the Vacuum energy when having momentum at the speed of light in space?

Because the photon is packaged with a mass that balances with the local Vacuum energy. And that also holds together the energy of the photon, h, to not to merge with the surrounding Vacuum energy.

One can also imagine that it is the Vacuum energy that gives the photon the energy for the momentum, which thrusts the photon up to the speed of c. Or at least makes it to sustain at the speed of c.

So, this gives the following eight options:

The mass of the photon is balanced against the local Vacuum energy.
The mass of the photon is hidden because of the local Vacuum energy.
The mass of the photon is hidden equal to the local Vacuum energy.
The mass of the photon tries to equal its energy of h.
The mass of the photon varies with statistical amount near its energy h.
The mass of the photon preserves the energy h to not split at c speed.
The mass of the photon vanishes when the photon- mass splits to qravitons.
The mass of the photon is measured with zero local Vacuum energy.

And zero local Vacuum energy is very hard to accomplish, and therefore it’s very hard to measure the mass of the photon.

And if zero local Vacuum energy thus is accomplished there sustains the energy of the photon itself, the h, that surrounds the mass of the photon. This has a most strange effect.

If zero local Vacuum energy is accomplished the photon theoretically loses its energy, h, because the energy, h, then balances with the mass of itself. If zero local Vacuum energy is accomplished the photon visible has no mass nor energy – it looks to vanish from the space-time horizon.

Photons from lasers makes fluorescence in calcite

For to be mathematical one can roughly write the photon, γ, anything like this:

h = [Ʌ] – mγ + h

Which stands for: Planck’s constant, h, equals to the local Vacuum energy, [Ʌ], minus the mass of the photon, mγ, plus Planck’s constant, h.

And the different energy parts in the “rough” formula are:
mγ = nγ [ u/g < 1 ]
h =    nh [ u/g > 1 ]

Where the local Vacuum energy, [Ʌ], consists of same but diminutive gravitational and tensional energy localized at the linear trajectory path the photon takes or is spatially bound to. One can here speculate why and how the photon does not prefer to physically stay in a rest mass condition, but always results in light speed order.

When this formula compensates the local Vacuum energy, [Ʌ], there also pops up a mass concept of the photon, mγ. Visible only Planck’s constant, h, seems to be detected without the full situation in mind. But there clearly are more under the surface. -Observe that this rough construction maybe guarantees the electrically neutral property which photons are equipped with.

Here, are some speculations and free mind reasoning:

An energy-quasi-plasma parcel
Since the photon looks like it has been encapsulated with energy composed of the proposed parts which the rough formula describes. -Encapsulated in the electromagnetic field, which as a suggestion also consists of the rough formula’s components. And when the photon seemingly here becomes an electrically neutral parcel, surrounded by an everywhere in Universe present field consisting of the photon’s residual elements. -It therefore looks like the behavior of plasma is at hand, when plasma always strives to become electrically neutral. Plasma also acts in collective manner under the influence of electric and magnetic fields. One therefore perhaps can classify the photon’s main characteristics resembling an energy-quasi-plasma parcel, electrically neutral, always striving for the speed of c and, always holding the energy amount of h. -How very intriguing. Especially when, also, the field itself, the electromagnetic field, is set under the behavior for this plasma criterion. I.e. trying to become electrically neutral. -Maybe the, electrically neutral, concentrated high energy-quasi-plasma parcel, which totally ignores the low energy electromagnetic field, from its, neutral, high energy parcel content, also is the reason for the photon assembling into an electrically neutral parcel. I.e. the law of neutrality forces the charged field itself to “snap off” microcosm parcels. Who knows? We also have to reflect over the ZPE, Zero Point Energy, law which contributes to all physical stances. The conclusion here, for me, is that these laws, the mentioned plasma criteria and the ZPE law, are “working” parallelly. -Contributing to applying force, h, Planck’s constant, and velocity, c, to the photon which results in its so-called constant speed in vacuum. The metaphor of a surfer on a steady wave comes to my mind. -Where the photon is the surfer, and the electromagnetic field is the ocean. The specific parallel combined function at the laws mentioned, applied to a suitable form of energy, creates force which is concentrated at the photon. Physical inevitable laws involved are the cause for the photon. -Of course. Also, this proposed behavior only occurs at precise conditions at all involved entities, which guarantees the constants of c and h come into existence.

The [Ʌ]
Curiously, if making a brief effort of the energy/ mass equivalence at a cubic Planck length from present estimations based on measurements by the Planck Collaboration, of the Vacuum energy density, one gets about 10^-98 Kg/ Planck length ^3. (The “Planck length” value is converted from 10^-26 Kg, being the measured average Vacuum energy density by the m^3.) This mass equivalence bric-a-brac calculus may give some references of how extremely small the mass of the photons could be. -When using the rough formula here proposed for the photon with the considered local Vacuum energy impact, the [Ʌ]. The photon mass therefore may be so small that it only can be theorized in this manner, and in a considerable time ahead will elude any effort of measurements. Nevertheless, this bric-a-brac photon mass estimation could be a reason why Black holes can exert a gravitational pull of photons. Which obviously occurs. And also hint of how much gravitational energy any Black hole may hold. (The factor between the radius of the electron and the Planck length is about 5 x 10^-21 where the Planck length is tremendously much smaller than the electron classical radius. These entities are referred here because the photon according to the standard model is considered a point particle without size or spatial extent. Observe that neither the electron radius nor the Planck length is measured. Both are calculated from QM related formulas.)

Light polarization and gravity
Some more probably relevant bric-a-brac: Faraday rotation refers to the rotation of the plane of polarization of electromagnetic waves, including light, as they pass through a magnetic or gravitational field. The Earth’s gravitational field induces a tiny change in the polarization of light passing through it. Experimental setups have been designed to measure this effect. One such experiment involves sending polarized light through a region influenced by the Earth’s gravitational field and observing the resulting rotation in the plane of polarization. While the rotation is extremely small, precise experimental techniques and advanced instrumentation have allowed researchers to detect and study gravitational Faraday rotation. (This paragraph here is merely a reminder of further and proceeding theoretical reviews concerning gravity, photons and light.)

So, continuing, if one makes a broader view one perhaps also can express X-ray and gamma “particles” with this formula. Just add a common multiply factor, b, to each part of the formula, for example an X-ray “particle” becomes:

bh = b[Ʌ] – bmγ + bh

And also the gamma-ray “particle” expressed in a similar way (with the multiply factor, c):

ch = c[Ʌ] – cmγ + ch

Since the initial X-ray and gamma-ray particles were “established” in phase 1 Aether going into phase 2 Aether, together with the first photons manifested in phase 2 Aether, in the early forming of our Universe; hence the photon is lacking any specific antiparticle, besides being its own antiparticle; it explains why all variants of photons are their own antiparticles. -And each not having any specific antiparticle. Besides, one can here note that since the photon family obviously is sprung from the Aether origin in the most early Universe; this family of particles is some type of “functional” “anachronism” in universal further development and in comparison to the other elementary particles’ origin and physical stance.

I have in an earlier Subsection 9 generally shown that the, most wanted and searched, bond in TOE, with GR, General Relativity, and QM, Quantum Mechanics, is achieved. -And also indicated that SR, Special Relativity, touches unification with QM. -Special relativity is theorizing about light in common and was also introducing the famous E=mc^2 equation. SR also predicts that light has a constant speed in vacuum. Regardless if the light source is moving or standing still. Some rather mysterious predictions. The here promoted Aether explanation with its evolving space establishing SEMF/ dark energy solves this last mentioned SR prediction. -With further explanation of why not modern science is detecting any Aether.

This TOE site can also here in this Subsection 13 declare that the QEB formula links the photon with X-ray and gamma radiation (i.e. giving the photon family), all three being not only electromagnetic radiation, but also manifesting as particles; all having hidden masses, which are equaled by the universal Vacuum energy including the SEMF force. -The remains of the once existed Aether.

-A note is that GR, General Relativity, speaks about gravity in general. And that SR, Special Relativity, analyzes light in common. Both these physical theories can be read about in the section of Quotes.


Subsection 14
Some stray thoughts

I have in Subsection 1 here in this page stated two time postulates, were time, TP1: is created by all forms of energy, and were time, TP2: only affects matter. My thesis presented in Subsection 3 and Subsection 4 was that the photon as the first unit of energy, h, also held matter, mγ, as the first such unit, before entering into the “zone” of non-time. Exactly when the photon disintegrates to quanta and vanishes from the space-time horizon.

What we now can discuss is if time does also exist in the “zone” of quanta? I.e. if the photon perhaps does live some kind of time-dependent and time-affecting “life” in this quanta status?

The answer is: No, the quanta status is a non-time zone or area. The proof upon this are first, of course, the two time postulates given in Subsection 1:

Time postulate 1. The cause of time is created by all forms of energy.
Time postulate 2. The effect of time is only applied on matter.

And the second part in the proof is The Quantum Energy Balance formula, the QEB:

ª u/g < 1 = ª u/g > 1 = ª E = 0

Or:

ª [ ª u/g < 1 <ª u/g > 1 ] = ª E = ƒ {T}

These two formulas here indicate energy. -Pure gravitational and pure electromagnetic energy, which represents the stage before the space-time reality. I.e. no space, time nor matter exists being in this stage.

Excluded mass, though having spin
Some sporadic side reasoning here, so far, indicates with the 2 given time postulates, that the photon has matter. It also has energy and being electromagnetic radiation. -The photon has matter. Whatever the word “matter” symbolizes and stands for. Maybe the a bit enigmatic property of spin, “angular momentum”, at the photon can be explained via its here proposed property of matter, or more scientifically phrased, its property of mass. If shortly reasoning from the two Time postulates given, a third Time postulate can be concluded, which together says: “The effect of energy is only applied on matter, resulting in spin.” Being the third postulate it evokes some reference entities, of space expressed in three dimensions, (x, y and z), and it evokes time, (t). -As the energy works on matter and its inertia, any duration of time is shown. When the photon, for example, has zero mass, and is still regarded as having spin 1, this intrinsic property thus shows on some type of matter condition. -Which the third Time postulate is hinting us about. We have although to be aware that on a quantum level, such as for photons or electrons, spin is not applicable with classical physics. -Only explicitly exposing quantum mechanics related properties. -The photon therefore obviously has properties such as energy, “mass”, spin among other carried qualities. Though the physics community for the moment doesn’t acknowledge mass belonging to its properties. And also sees the photon for a point particle without spatial extent. Probably its mass may be so diminutive that it in average physical stances can be excluded. One awkward physical condition may come to reality when it seems that it’s the photon’s construction of the superior tension amount relative to its proposed minimal gravitational entity which sustains its linear momentum. Obviously its electrically neutral composition plays an important role here.

Electromagnetic radiation
What one here briefly may notice is that the discovery of the universal Vacuum energy, in combination with the here proposed extremely diminutive mass at the photon. -Together can explain the photon’s manner without seemingly inertia traveling at c speed with linear momentum. -Also, the photon’s c velocity trajectory, without any reaction on the universal Vacuum density or the electromagnetic environment; may be caused from the photon’s, in previous Subsection 13, proposed quasi-plasma electrically neutral construction. With this note we also may comprehend the interchangeable function of that electromagnetic force, also, behaves like light. -Since the photon generally is seen being quanta of the electromagnetic field.

The photon’s central position
Further, one can also rather surely comprehend that we here are in some type of “borderline” state between energy and mass. It looks like the photon is among the first of the microcosm- quantum energy entities which link or swap the two concepts of energy and mass. -Therefore the mass aspect of the photon probably becomes very or extremely diminutive. This manner of looking at these entities should not really be so hard to evaluate, The tough aspect here lies how energy comes into our physics, how it’s evoked. Most of the physics community holds the Big Bang responsible. Where the QEB statement is one of several challengers to the BB. Though the QEB idea has a most different way of introducing energy. The photon, however, remains with its central position, as it has in ordinary QM, like, it has in the QEB‘s view of an alternative evolution of the elementary particles.

Continuing on theory of gravity…

Of course, there exists energy in the quanta zone, which could activate time events. But there exists no “matter” in the quanta zone, only energy is present. I.e. the once existing photon is converted into qravitons, nγ [ u/g < 1 ], and semf– energy, nh [ u/g > 1 ]. This explains how a photon can return from the zone of quanta, with the “rebuild” of its mass-part, nγ [ u/g < 1 ], and its energy-part, nh [ u/g > 1 ]; into an environment of varying local SEMF, +/-n [ u/g > 1 ].

-Observe that the “rebuild” or “creation” of the photon occurs when the qravitons and semf have an excess moment in the local Vacuum energy volume. And vice versa occurs, the photon disintegrates, at a moment of deficit in the local Vacuum energy range. -And more, the photon is defined as being a stable elementary particle, which indicates very small variations in the local Vacuum energy field. I.e. space seems locally to be very drained from “photons affecting energies”. -And the earlier explained “left over energies“, dark matter and dark energy, probably don’t either interact in this stance when being too weak for taking part in the described photon-cycle. Maybe the “left over energies” can interact in special manners at high energy levels. We can thus note a distinction at the photon “high” energy range and, at the diminutive dark matter and dark energy range.

-This distinction is revealed if one considers novel space being locally much or extremely drained from “photons affecting energies”. And we can also sufficiently explain the “spooky effect” observed in physics. -Or the more scientifically known Quantum entanglement affecting photons, neutrinos and electrons for example. -The disintegration of the photon releasing its qravitons and semf or the specific energy loss of the neutrino or the electron in the local volume; can therefore locally attach sufficient “energy” for the other particle to instantly react on rather long distances. This “spooky effect” can only be achieved if we consider the physical “law” of a system’s search for the lowest possible energy state interfered with a sudden local excess of quantum energies. -The Quantum entanglement can further be boosted, and achieved, with interference of the 95% of dark matter and dark energy existing in our space, in combination with the physical “law” mentioned.

And as mentioned earlier, the environment of the local Vacuum energy, [Ʌ], hides the mass, mγ, of the photon.

The situation that the [Ʌ] is hiding the mass of the photon indicates that the [Ʌ] also is preserving the photon intact; in such a manner that the photon is defined as being a stable particle. -The general reasoning here also implement that the amount of gravitational energy, qravitons, locally and wide range seems to be very or extremely sparse. I.e. the novel presence of vast amounts of Black holes, with their major gravitational draw in our Universe, are supporting the very sparse existence of qravitons. This has an immense negative effect on the possibility of “modern” photons being “rebuilt” or created. -Observe that we here are reasoning of the “rebuilds” of photons in “empty” space.

The “rebuilds” of “modern” photons are thus rare and spontaneous depending on the reaching of local enough qravitons, nγ [ u/g < 1 ], and local enough semf– energy, nh [ u/g > 1 ]; into a varying SEMF environment, +/-n [ u/g > 1 ]. The interesting issue here becomes if the photon- “reconstruction” being independent or dependent on the varying SEMF environment, +/-n [ u/g > 1 ]?

Since the photon energy, h, is confirmed constant by measurements the answer is that it’s statistically indicated that the “rebuild” of the photon is independent of the varying SEMF environment. -This induces that the mass of the photon, also, is a constant. And the former mentioned equilibrium function (see Subsection 6) at the photon probably “adjusts” its existence, of a constant mass, at the everywhere in Universe present varying SEMF environment. -Whether in motion or not.

Equilibrium spots depending on various energy values (*4)

The reasoning in this Subsection 14 and in Subsection 13 indicates that the mass of the photon exists, and also is a constant.

Can we unite it being: mγ?

I.e. theoretically these two formulas occurred, defining the mass and the energy of the photon:

mγ = nγ [ u/g < 1 ]
h =    nh [ u/g > 1 ]

Generally, the mγ value is here achieved with the non- space, time nor matter defined qraviton. And the h value is made of its opposite semf function. -And they should therefore be regarded for not being “real” physical entities. Then just remember the beginning creation process of the photon when the Aether 1, A1, did gather due to the gravitational assembled pull manifesting the newborn photons at Aether stage 2, A2. -The mγ is though not “visible for the eye”, but the energy, h, of the photon is.

Since the “plasma” state is supposed to occur when the atoms are divided into its opposite charged elementary particles, electrons and protons, at very high temperatures. E.g. at fusions, such as in nuclear bomb explosions or in the cores of stars. -When one standard view of Universe is that it’s in a constant cold plasma condition due to the vast content of opposite charged particles. One can presume that the qraviton, holding some type of charge, and the semf being at an opposite polarity, also behave in a similar way that plasma does. -Plasma physics is ruled by several criteria, where one central rule is that it always tends to become neutral with its charged particles content. Hence initially the qravitons and semf probably gather into vast interstellar neutral cold plasma resembling clouds. Thereafter the merging of qravitons and semf may be enhanced in the building of the photon family particles. -Simultaneously dark matter, dark energy/ SEMF and WIMPs remains, from the photon family creation, and are established at their functions in the forthcoming universal frame.

What we here when discussing the concepts of space, time, energy and matter, both theoretically and physically have stumbled upon are the borders of consensus of the Scientific community.

The consensus of the Scientific community is of importance, else anarchy rules, but these borders are constantly on the agenda of the works of physics.


Subsection 15
Late note of Higgs boson

Higgs field was indicated at the CERN LHC machine, in 2012 by the high collision energy of 8 TeV (4+4 TeV), with the recurring detection of a massive 125 GeV bosonic particle. (The searched QM– collision reaction theoretically only needs a minimum of 1.4 GeV.) The proton proton collision occurred in the supposed field of the cosmological constant, the Vacuum energy field (which was theorized by Albert Einstein). -And in the electromagnetic field, the EMF. The issue here becomes if these both physical energy fields, the EMF and the Vacuum fields, are of the same origin; and are unified by high energies? Where the theorized Higgs boson manifests at raised energies, and the EMF and Vacuum energy fields normally are present with standard energies. -Note that Higgs boson is supposed to be established in a non-vector field environment. Where the EMF energy field is a vector field, a field with direction. -And if we are raising the energy level we theoretically maybe can get a local non-vector scalar field. -A EMF, vector, energy field converted to a Higgs, non-vector, field, by adding high energies.

One question becomes if the hypothetical Higgs boson/ field only manifests at high energies? We know: A, that the probability for an energy field missing direction is larger if high energies are externally attached. B, that the EMF energy field, the electromagnetic field, if missing high energies, is a vector field. So, if adding high energies to a vector field it theoretically can convert to a non-vector field. -At least locally.

We also got the in Subsection 9 theorized entities of “left over energies“, the mystic “dark matter” and “dark energy“. That obviously became the most frequent, in amount, existing QM “particles” in our Universe. -When analyzing these particles using the statistical normal distribution curve with the presented QEB, the Quantum Energy Balance, formula. We also found that the “left over energies” were too “weak” to actively interact in the developing Universe. -The naming of these dark entities to quasi- qravitons and quasi- SEMF hints at their lost functions. Although these “weak” QM “particles” (including WIMPs) represent about 95% of the total existing matter and energy. And their large deficits of force make them good candidates for establishing non-vector- scalar “particle” fields. The weak, or missing, polarities these fields hold probably results in a functional non-force, neutral, scalar overlapping “mix” of “quasi- matter” and “quasi- energy”. -And probably being a perfect candidate for the by Peter Higgs and other researchers’ presented theory of an everywhere universal existing field, the so-called Higgs field.

Then we got two field candidates, for creating the searched scalar boson, Higgs boson, to appear in the LHC project:

1. The EMF energy field locally “boosted” with external high energy changing to a non-vector energy field state. Still, the chances are not in favor of manifesting Higgs boson here, when this type of field only holds EMF energy and almost totally lacks matter. -Though maybe it can be converted from a local vector field to a local non-vector field, if boosted externally with high energies. -Still being almost totally drained from matter.
   
   
2. The dark matter and dark energy– overlapping field. Which probably can provide matter and energy for the 125 GeV Higgs boson to appear, if adding external mass and energy. E.g. at the LHC project. This type of field is supposed to lack direction, but having mass and energy, which makes it a non-vector, scalar, energy field.

The last reasoning can indicate if the theorized Higgs field exists in Universe. -Both at high and low energy ranges. One note of importance is that every physical event tries to exist at the lowest energy level possible. -This physical behavior can also lead to the issue of which field is supporting Higgs boson.

If refining the issue, does any local EMF energy change to a Higgs field at high energies? -Or are they, the EMF and the overlapping dark field, solitary and stable entities? -At the most possible low energy state, one or both, supporting the making of Higgs boson? -I’m trying to prove which is the physical correct field. And I’m also advocating that these fields are different physical entities.

It’s a tricky issue, still, interesting…

The EMF energy got direction, besides having energy. It’s a vector force field. -When Higgs boson is a scalar boson and represents an energy field without direction. Then Higgs boson must have been created from dark matter and dark energy existing in all parts of our Universe.

Computer simulation – Higgs boson search

So, the Higgs boson discovery in 2012 obviously showed dark matter and dark energy existing. Which makes sense to me. -And maybe being a bit risky to reveal with the LHC machine. -This when about 95% of Universe’s total matter and energy are dark. And up today not being able to detect, nor explain, with novel physics. -Except with the LHC project and the Higgs field theory.

-If here also presenting some recent data from the Planck Collaboration project, concerning the observed – no matter space – average Vacuum energy amount in Universe of about 3 GeV/m^3. -And relate this to the repeatedly measured Higgs boson of 125 GeV; one can notice a possible correlation between dark matter and dark energy, sprung from the proposed QEB formula’s “quasi- matter” and “quasi- energy”, being involved. The collision area at the LHC machine is constructed to be as free as possible from any stray particles and electromagnetic noise by high pressure vacuum and cooling systems. Though some electromagnetic energy cannot be shield from the synchrotron radiation used for accelerating the protons to near the light speed. And the collision area is also covered from any possible stray light sources. The experiment cannot at all repeat the universal overall vacuum at 3 GeV/m^3 totally free from any elementary particles, where the Higgs field is supposed to exist. On the contrary the theory behind the LHC experiment is built on the Standard Model’s prediction of a considerably higher value, a VEV at about 246 GeV. -The lowest working energy level at which mass is revealed and manifested at. -Observe that finding this VEV indicates the physical existence of Higgs field, exclusively in this order.

Though Higgs field, estimated as an energy field and sprung from the Standard Model, calculates with a VEV, a vacuum expectation value. -Considered for being the lowest non-zero average – probabilistic fluctuating – value at which the Higgs mechanism is expressing mass to all the intrinsic massive elementary particles. -Where the VEV of the Higgs field is a fundamental parameter that sets the energy scale at which electroweak symmetry breaking occurs. An intuitive way to describe this may be that nature borrows some type of energy for to become massive. The Higgs field is both estimated and studied (the LHC) which has resulted in the VEV amount of approximately 246 GeV, without any correlating volume given, also known as the vacuum state. -Note that the VEV of the Higgs field is a property of Universe as a whole and is thought to represent a universal constant throughout space and time. And it is not expected that the VEV of the Higgs field would go below neither go above its minimum value of approximately 246 GeV under normal circumstances, according to the framework of the Standard Model.

It’s in its place to mention that the constancy of this VEV is a foundational assumption of the Standard Model, and understanding its origin is a topic of ongoing research in theoretical physics. While various hypotheses have been proposed, no definitive explanation has yet been established. Further theoretical developments and experimental observations may provide insights into the nature of this VEV being the energy gradation at which the Higgs field is established, with an associated mass or electroweak scale around 246 GeV, contributing to its special role in fundamental physics. Although we have to be aware that the total cosmological view concerning the Higgs mechanism is the assumption of a Big Bang representing a hot and dense Universe expanding. Where also this cosmological aspect is placed on the QFT and the Standard Model which both are the foundation for today’s physics and where the reasoning of the Higgs field is included. Probably the novel particle physics is not affected especially much by different origins though, as mentioned, entire cosmological theories are more dependent on early universal evolution.

If one by the reasoning so far may give an idea of how Higgs field, sustaining its VEV, can be explained is the slight similar notion of that the gravitational constant, G, is a constant which the scientific community also has difficulties to find out how it’s established. The reasoning may begin with the Quantum vacuum state. The lowest energy state a volume can hold, without any elementary particles, still not empty. Where the Higgs energy field should have its occupation, expressing any passing, or resting, elementary particle its mass. So does the gravitational constant parallelly manifesting gravity, however in a most diminutive amount. How are these physical stances correlated?

If we remember how the gravitational constant earlier was hinted at or proposed to occur (see Subsection 5), we noticed that the formula of the photon regulation was in need of all the Black holes in Universe. -How this regulation is thought to give a rudimentary balance of the gravitational strength at which the photon alters between its dissolved energy parts, its quanta, and its life as an elementary particle. Hence, we can notice the balanced strength, pressure or energy level occurring with the dissolved quanta versus the photon existing phase. Both Higgs field and the gravitational constant are in need of this special quanta-photon balance establishing a specific – probabilistic fluctuating – amount of energy in a specific volume. -I.e. establishing a universal constant “hidden” energy density. Therefore, we can notice some brief hinted correlation with the universal gravity strength, G, and Higgs field’s amount of cosmic energy. Exactly how the mass and gravity at any elementary particle further are mathematically and physically expressed we may calculate with the Higgs mechanism and not yet written formulas regarding the very diminutive gravitation of quantum particles. Although we can far away notice some type of bonding concerning quantum mechanics, QM, and GR, though at very small gravity levels. Observe that the electromagnetic level at this microcosm scale (the photon scale) is not that extreme as expected versus the gravitational amount due to the microcosm dimension where gravity begins to “catch up” its macrocosm environmental normal legacy. -The basic relativistic situation between electromagnetism and gravity is beginning to even up. So, here, widely, it exists a rudimentary correlation between the photon regulation, the Black holes, Higgs field’s interdependence to its VEV and G. -If so, it’s a fair example of how QM and GR may be united.


v – Vacuum Expectation Value formula for the W-boson


Subsection 16
Modern field physics

Modern field physics is collected under the abbreviation of ZPE, Zero Point Energy, in German Nullpunktsenergie. This name originates from the “law” of all physical systems’ search for the lowest possible energy state. In novel quantum field theory two different fields are stated: Matter field (i.e. leptons and quarks) and force field (e.g. photons and gluons), which both are ruled by zero point energy physics. The resemblance with Aether physics is noted here by the physics community though without the original light propagation medium aspect. And we have also to be aware that absolute zero Kelvin is not possible in these fields when the Heisenberg uncertainty principle (position/ momentum) always is at hand.

Since novel field theories can be calculated with these three aspects, matter and force fields and the Heisenberg uncertainty principle, the sum of the total Vacuum energy is about a “factor” of 10^120 greater than the observed Vacuum energy. More recent calculations do improve this discrepancy to about a “factor” of 10^55. This discrepancy is one of modern physics unsolved mysteries and is named as the cosmological constant problem. This “factor” must really be noticed for one of physics up to date “stall”. -And the discrepancy between the theoretical prediction and the observed value of the vacuum energy density is considered one of the largest discrepancies in the history of theoretical physics.

When the “quasi- qravitons“- aspect in modern field physics is manifested by leptons and quarks (fermions). And the “quasi- SEMF“- impact is estimated from photons and gluons (bosons); exemplified from the quantum field theory. When the Heisenberg uncertainty principle effect on the elementary particles mentioned is applied. The value of the total Vacuum energy (cosmological constant) is raised. -If one compares the novel estimated Vacuum energy effect with the here in this page presented QEB formula entities -And especially, instead, “calculates” with the formula’s both left over energies. -The cosmological constant problem could have its solution and answer here.

The basic reasoning of why the QEB entities are, or could be, involved into the solution of the huge cosmological constant problem’s inconsistency is based, of course, by their pure construction being the original “invisible” microcosm entities; which all further developed universal elements are built upon. These proposed entities are the origin of the smallest up to the largest universal objects. So, when also being the origin of all elementary particles and energy fields they could suit the answer of the cosmological constant problem.


Subsection 17
Physical fields conclusions

The cosmological constant, Ʌ, includes dark matter and dark energy and it has a major impact on all matter, galaxies to photons, in Universe. Examples are the astringent force which keeps the galaxies’ arms together from splitting due the centrifugal force when rotating, which dark matter is supposed to do. And dark energy is regarded for making all the galaxies in Universe move apart at an accelerating pace. Other forces such as the different radiation forms from, for example, all the galaxies and their stars are added into the total resulting push/ pull effect on all the matter in our Universe. Observe that also WIMPs probably also interact in the astringent force keeping the galaxies and maybe Universe fairly assembled. Though, the WIMPs are not here included into dark matter since the QEB formula defines them for “visible” matter similar to the photon, and its family of particles.

The dark matter and dark energy are, here in this page, manifested being left over energies, both gravitational and electromagnetic, theorized from the QEB formula. Other descriptions are quasi- qravitons (quasi- matter) and quasi- SEMF (quasi- energy) that can hint at their behavior, function and position. -In the entire cosmological interaction. -Also named for the universal wavefunction, where the “totality of an evolving existence” is manifested to everything simultaneously. Compared to classical physics where energy and momentum acts locally and “one by one”. Perhaps the QEB formula can be a candidate for a universal wavefunction with its suggestions of probability, symmetry and pre existence of spatial Quantum Energy Fields, evolving to a shared Quantum Gravity Field universal presence. -Which not directly, is excluding, neither, is including any multiverse option.

The electromagnetic field, EMF, is on the other hand manifested and theoretically originating from the QEB, Quantum Energy Balance, formula. -Being derived from the QEB theory as an active and fully functioning, interacting, cosmological “visible” entity supporting the electromagnetic environments of our Universe. (See Subsection 9.) Alternatively, the dark energy, the quasi- SEMF, can and, is “interacting” with the ordinary “visible” EMF. Since it has various electromagnetic “strength”, varying from zero up till ordinary EMF force.

Though we have to be clear about that the quasi- SEMF has a big interval of missing “strengths” up to ordinary EMF– value. Since these have been involved in the build of the photon family and the WIMPs in the early forming of our Universe. -When phase 1 Aether converted to phase 2 Aether. Let’s call this the EMF A2 zone. -Or the photon family drain. Therefore, we can estimate the remaining, in comparison a very sparse amount, ordinary “full size” EMF; with its drained version, the dark energy; composing the total electromagnetic environment in our present Universe. Seemingly there is a physical, and certainly a functional, distinction between the sparse “full size” EMF and its drained, very rich in amount, dark energy variant. And, of course, we have to notice, when mentioning the early photon creation, that photons, and their higher energy versions, constantly are produced from stars and other sources in present Universe. (See also note (*2) for a summary of the total EMF range description.)

Attempts have been made from the novel research- focus finding signs of the assumed existing dark matter, occupying about 25% of our Universe, through the popular sun neutrino projects. -Since all time the three-flavor neutrino theory was confirmed in the 1990’s this field of research has been on the physics agenda. Maybe the late discovery that the neutrino changes flavor (oscillates) much faster than the theory and standard model predicts is hinting on the enigmatic dark matter. -Or parallel on a fourth neutrino flavor. -This idea has although been rejected by much late studies. Therefore, the idea that gravity- energy, especially the here proposed remaining diminutive forms of qravitons, is interacting with the neutrino propulsion in a shorter spatial manner than thought is not that unlikely. This late discovery is shaking the standard model of our elementary particles. I.e., the theory of the neutrino being exactly massless has been contravened by these late experiments. Because the neutrino cannot oscillate, when it travels through space or matter, without self having mass.

The physics community, for the moment, are having different approaches and speculations about the Higgs field and the Vacuum energy field. What is their origin? How do they correlate? If they are different types of fields? To my view the Higgs field is a part of the Vacuum energy field consisting of both dark matter and dark energy, where the Higgs field exclusively relates to the dark matter component. -And the WIMPs, as mentioned, are excluded from the dark matter concept. And where the cosmological constant, Ʌ, is a specific form of Vacuum energy which remains constant over time and space, contributing to the overall energy density of the Universe. I.e. the Vacuum energy field is fluctuating at quantum level and contribute to a non-zero energy density, where the Ʌ is considered describing the homogeneous universal field. This reasoning reveals the Ʌ truly consisting of Higgs field, dark energy and the WIMPs on the side as some type of universal assembling entity. Which also the Higgs field on a very large scale contributes to. This explanation is somewhat relieving to me when universal physics seems to be swarming with all sorts of fields. And the cosmological constant problem may be hinted a solution if we can decrease the fields involved. I think that I have to mention that the reasoning here at this page is a fair part of the ongoing physics constant updating and reviewing.

If, also approaching the obvious idea, relating the cosmological constant to a mixture of dark energy and dark matter, where the dominance of dark energy leads to a positive cosmological constant, Λ > 0. -And where the accelerated expansion of Universe, explained in this way, has been discussed and explored within the context of theoretical physics and cosmology. However, it is not a mainstream or widely accepted idea in current physics research. Further, if including or excluding the WIMPs in the dark matter category one still gets a fixed positive cosmological constant. (Where the WIMPs still act in the background though not are included.) More cosmic observations can determine if the WIMPs should be counted to the dark matter form, and if both dark energy and dark matter belong to the Vacuum energy.


Subsection 18
Is physics missing something?

Most of the novel physics seem to be alright though, different parts like, the age of Universe becomes not the same with different counting methods. The total CMB-, cosmic microwave background, mapping by Planck space telescope is not showing the big speckled pattern it should. It’s more smooth and even spread than calculated. And the most recent observation from the James Webb telescope puzzles the researchers. -This when the findings of 6 most far away galaxies, about 13.5 billion years old, are giant when expected being small tiny “baby” galaxies. This is not possible when Universe, estimated to be about 13.8 billion years old, should not be capable of creating such large galaxies the first 500-700 million years of its existence. Such anomalies are creating doubt of a correct novel physics.

Planck reveals an almost perfect Universe

Probably there is at least generally nothing wrong with the QM physics. -Though the origin of the, so far discovered, quantum mechanics particles can be the cause of some of the anomalies reported. -When, the origin of the observed elementary particles are not included in the QM mathematics.

It can be the Big Bang reasoning which is giving the differences at the mentioned calculations and observations. -I.e. how the elementary particles are created can be the cause of the discrepancy. Here the suggested QEB universal wavefunction formula may be a fair substitute for the BB. When the QEB formula is giving somewhat different evolution of our Universe, especially of the elementary particles’ creation history. And the QEB formula may hint at large or massive galaxies created in the beginning of our Universes, At least it doesn’t go against massive first born galaxies in Universe. -This is impossible with the Big Bang universal early evolution. When the BB and its inflation theory sustains a very hot and chaotic early Universe contradicting early massive galaxies. -The QEB formula’s progress doesn’t have this early Universe intense experience.

Also, the discrepancy in the calculations with the QFT, quantum field theory, regarding the cosmic constant and the theory’s major contribution to the huge deviation between the calculated and observed values, has to be mentioned. The QFT uses several types of fields and virtual particles incorporated in its mathematical framework, maybe all these different entities are a crucial reason for this huge deviation. If we are about to trust on the observed cosmic constant average value one must allow a deeper scrutiny of this aspect of the QFT. And as mentioned the QEB formula does not primarily evoke any more fields than the presented variants of quasi- SEMF, SEMF and the photon family which is tied up in electrically neutral semf particles (*2). -Also, the quasi- qravitons, is a remaining field, after that the Black holes have swept Universe free from most of the gravitational components, defined as dark matter, and finally disclosed being Higgs field. Hence the virtual particles and corresponding different fields, which are essential in QFT, are in the QEB statement not required. -Which is giving a definitive minor mathematical aspect of the cosmological constant. I’m though aware that the QFT has a most profound position in today’s physics. And cannot easily be exposed for counter argumentation.


Subsection 19
Spacetime and gravity

The concept of gravity came from spacetime itself. This was the mind-boggling idea that Einstein finally “landed” in. -After the beginnings of his contemplation of gravity, with Aether resembling ideas. It was the 20th century’s physics most mystic reasoning. Einstein stated that the curved space in combination with matter induced gravity in the 1915 GR, general relativity, papers. And he did rule out any form of universal propagation substance with the reasoning that any medium for gravity was not necessary. And that only space and matter was evoking the impact of pull on corresponding mass.

When Einstein used previous physicists’ model of a four dimensional spatial matrix from space and time, crafting his pervasive general relativity idea, it became the physics cornerstone it still is today. Though some recent physicists claim that time isn’t needed in physics. -And if we also claim space the same fate. We have made a clean space-time cut-out from physics.

Gravity continues the same

Maybe Einstein wouldn’t oppose that much if he only could take part of the QEB, quantum energy balance, formula. Because the QEB basic ideas don’t reinstall any late 19th century Aether- concept. -Though it speaks of an Aether that once existed in the early forming of our Universe. Then vanished and transformed to almost only electromagnetic field. Also sustaining with, for the moment, untraceable dark matter and dark energy in novel Universe. -Which, in combination with matter created from – and with – the evolving QEB universal wavefunction, explains the gravitational behavior space has. Space and time can thus be regarded as obsolete in GR physics. Remaining only as imaginary reference units. When gravity continues the same. Possibly the mystic curved spacetime concept can remain in physics although be de-mystified with the proposed QEB formula.

I think that the frequently occurring observation and reasoning in this entire page as the line – “Then vanished and transformed to almost only electromagnetic field.” – is most crucial for our Universe. -How the Aether once was transformed and vanished leaving almost only remaining EMF, due to the extreme affecting growth of billions after billions of Black holes. -When these enormous deposits, both in amount and contents of gravity, swept the entire early Universe from its massive components, they cannot sufficiently be pointed out as being responsible for the novel construction of our Universe. -Situations like that the photon family functionally being without mass. -And space seemingly existing without gravitational components such as the graviton or similar entities. Did appear. -Leaving only the mystic spacetime behavior visible, exemplified with the green apple falling down to the ground of earth.


Subsection 20
The unification of QM and GR

So, the QEB qraviton entity, q = u/g < 1, is not only sustaining with energy/ gravity to the build of massive and non massive particles inside the major Black holes, building electrons and protons (holding quarks and gluons); the quasi- qraviton entity, here suggested being dark matter; may also be the “substance” which, for the moment impossible to detect, is unifying QM and GR. -I.e. the “mystic” curved spacetime encounter with mass evoking gravity can be explained with the QEB linked quasi- qraviton being the intermediating medium that makes the GR spacetime formulas depicting gravity so well. In these both ways one can widely state the unification of QM and GR seems to be accomplished.

One reflection concerning why protons are so much heavier than electrons must be mentioned here. The mass of the proton is approximately 99.95% greater than the mass of the electron. Or, roughly 1,836 times more massive than electrons. Protons then are significantly more massive than electrons. This major difference in mass indicates the manner in which they both are created, here suggested, inside the Black holes. And preferably with the least frequent, but “heaviest”, variants of the qravitons, u/g < 1. Which is sustaining the Black holes with an overwhelming amount of “mass” relatively electromagnetic energy according to the base expression of the qraviton. So, if the Black holes are mostly “fed” with the most potent variants of u/g < 1 the output, protons and electrons, should generally have this large difference in mass, as they obviously have.

Another reflection is the year 2015 LIGO detection of gravitational waves. Here one can scientifically use the metaphor of a stone dropped in a pond where the ripples and tiny waves on the surface are spread out from the incident, just like gravitational waves behave from any cosmic major event. Though these gravitational waves are a function of the GR spacetime concept. -One can believe that this similarity in behavior is caused by some gravitational intermediating medium maybe explained with the here proposed QEB quasi- qraviton universal gravitational substance.

LIGO mirrors change by a few thousandths of a proton diameter

Since the origin for the LIGO detection in 2015 was two average size stellar Black holes merging (29 and 36 sun masses). Then the resulting emission of the remaining mass as gravitational wave energy indicates that the proposed intermediating medium should be faint and existing in entire Universe. -When the detected few oscillations only were orders of fractions of the diameter of a proton. -And when the merging occurred approximately at 1.3 billion light-years distance. One striking observation concerning these mirror images are their conformity at approximately 3000 Km distance, which does indicate some type of constancy at the medium in question. The idea earlier presented of the quasi- qravitons, revealed as Higgs field, may have some relevance for being this medium, when this field is supposed to permeate all Universe with some type of constancy. For to be certain of Higgs field involved in gravitational waves larges distances should be used at the opposite detector station localities.


Subsection 21
The graviton versus the qraviton

The QEB formula should be imposed at the normal statistical distribution curve for, the varying amounts and strengths of the gravitational entity, the qravitons. Though there are some “steps” which divide the presence of the qravitons in free universal space. -Where the varying amounts of SEMF stays on a fairly high level during all these “steps”.

If we theoretically assume that the first “step” – after the gathering of the both base entities in the QEB universal wavefunction (Aether 1 goes to Aether 2) – is the creation of photons, X-ray and gamma particles. Also WIMPs (weakly interacting massive particles) are coming to existence. This is partly draining the newborn Universe from both qravitons and semf. How near to the weakest forms these both QEB entities come to use, in the particles build, is rather difficult to estimate. Though the the most frequent and weakest forms – of qraviton = u/g < 1 and semf = u/g > 1 (SEMF) – are not interacting in this first cycle of the Universe’s setup. They remain unchanged being the most frequent amounts. -And should as a suggestion be the answer for the novel existence of dark matter and dark energy.

Probably also the least frequent amounts of the qravitons and SEMF, the most potent of these entities, are left out at the creation of the different light-particles and WIMPs. When the most potent qravitons cannot stay in a solitary state they begin to assemble into large gravity deposits (Aether 2 goes to Aether 3) (an Aether 3 is a Black hole). This is later resulting in that the more frequent, weaker, free qravitons together with dissolving – local Aether 1 spots are reoccurring – photons, X-ray and gamma particles made in the first “step”, also are gathering and then merging into the large gravity deposits. Therefore, we after a certain period have a very large number of Black holes in the young Universe which totally drain it from almost all remaining qravitons and dissolved “light”-particles.

Primarily, local Aether 1 areas, reoccurring from all the newly created Black holes, are dissolving most of the photon- family particles, which now are swept into the Black holes. -When some of the WIMPs with diminutive masses eludes the fate of being “eaten, probably due to their assembling into vast clouds with a faint own intrinsic “counter” gravity. -Resulting in different strengths of SEMF remaining in Universe. After that, the vast amounts of Black holes are beginning to jet electrons and emit protons. I.e. the Black holes are an original source for the massive, and non-massive, elementary particles and for their sheer existence. -Then comes the merging of these emitted particles creating vast interstellar clouds of hydrogen. And finally, the Universe is starting its stars and planets era. -Universe goes from the dark phase into its new bright and light epoch, with a simultaneously stronger and stronger EMF establishment. -The stars and planets creation and life cycles continue to produce particles, and the rest of our elements. And the dying and collapsing stars are also contributing to different, more or less, spectacular events in our Universe.

These are the main reasons why novel Universe is free from almost all qravitons of different strength. And holding the total EMF inclusive the SEMF environment consisting of different types of electromagnetic field deduced from the QEB universal wavefunction. Probably the most diminutive qravitons also still are present in Universe and being an answer or hint how Einstein’s theory of spacetime is manifesting gravity. What we must notice here is that qravitons with major strengths are the primary reason for all the Black holes holding their enormous gravitational force. Providing the emitted electrons and protons with their mass in some Black hole internal mechanism.

And the only universal free remaining gravitational entity are the most diminutive forms of qravitons. -There is a chance for this diminutive gravitational entity, like the photon, to be regarded as massless due to its existence in the universal surroundings of SEMF. If these very faint qravitons also can be defined as a tensor boson – it can be equaled to the most awaited and searched graviton. -Some proof of this is the known fact that gravity is generally a very weak force. You can jump the surface of earth easily at least almost a feet high. Though one strong objection of these qravitons being the sought graviton is the situation of the gravitational entity is not quantified. -Not holding the QM signum of defined grades. Still, exactly how the remaining drained spatial varying SEMF strengths in combination with the corresponding varying remaining diminutive gravitational entity effectively acts is hard for me to estimate.

Subsection 22
Epilogue

One striking physical condition when writing this epilogue is the extreme vast amount of energy that finally, after eons of time (time, which theoretically doesn’t exist in this gathering), is assembled in our pre Universe. -Both gravitational and electromagnetic energy are gathering at about the same amounts, thus maybe not at a similar pace. Exactly how the both entities mix and help each other to assemble into a more and more astringent volume that shrinks and finally reaches the size of our Universe is a bit difficult to estimate. Some plausible reason, among others, for these both extremely faint opposite charged entities to gather or assemble from an infinite pre-interstellar spatial condition is the plasma behavior of a quasineutral composition. That’s to say generally plasma has a strong tendency to become electrically neutral in its finalizing volume.

The QEB formula is, in its elementary and infinite parts, giving probability for both symmetry and of extreme amounts, of the both entities described. Also the simple manner of arranging the specified gravitational and electromagnetic energies is enhancing the probability of their nature to come to existence. We know that gravity and electromagnetism exists, but not how they originated into our physics.

Compared to the Big Bang theory of our Universe’s creation the QEB formula is based on intuition and also is excluding the BB‘s very complicated and partly unnatural premises. The only valid argument that BB has occurred is the CMB, the Cosmic microwave background, reality. Maybe the in all directions the same measured faint radiation can be explained with physics taking place at the rim of our Universe (see Quotes page 9 – Fermions).

Though a more plausible cause for the CMB radiation is the function of heat entropy, or simply spoken the “reversed refrigerator” behavior: A vast volume with energy/ matter/ plasma contracting into a smaller volume. In this manner the QEB collects the infinite space’s almost 0 Kelvin environment to our Universe’s volume and establishes the about 2.7 Kelvin detected cosmic blackbody microwave temperature.

To establish BB for the universal birth is to my point of view both to build on mysticism and on vague premises and extreme mathematics. The QEB formula is on the other hand built on plausible normal statistical occurrence and on the vast function of the infinite space. Though a lot of physicists are not yet familiar with such physics, it’s a reality to take in consideration.

Einstein’s manner of explaining gravity must be revalued or refined though it remains the same in the calculus of it. Nothing has changed in the way we physically experience it. The diminutive forms of the remaining qravitons‘ coexistence or merging with the universal electromagnetic reality only shows an explanation of Einstein’s gravity concept. It doesn’t change it. Here one must mention that the enormous amounts of theorized faint qravitons filling the entire Universe really is possible with the origin of infinity. -It all is just plain statistics. And when speculating how the giant Black holes, each at the center of each galaxy. Sprung from the QEB formula. Have created the total amount of stars any galaxy is made of. One must surrender for the uttermost giant supply of energies infinity holds.

That my search for the graviton since early 2000 should end with the non graviton experience is not that astonishing. Though I would really be surprised if it’s found.

Regards
/admin

Updated 2024-05-04

to Notes page 3